In a surprising turn of events, the New York Yankees have turned their attention towards Cody Bellinger instead of the coveted Kyle Tucker, showcasing the dynamic nature of MLB trades this offseason. The implications of this shift resonate deeply within the league, stirring debate among aficionados regarding the impact and substance of both deals.
A vibrant discussion erupted among our MLB analysts:
Which trade is the real winner: The Yankees snagging Cody Bellinger or the Cubs acquiring Kyle Tucker?
Deesha Thosar offers her insights, favoring the Yankees’ acquisition of Bellinger. Why? It boils down to sheer value; general manager Brian Cashman essentially secured Bellinger for a minimal cost—trading only the thirty-year-old righty, Cody Poteet, who had a somewhat uneventful tenure, showcasing a 3.80 ERA over three seasons. Poteet will join the Cubs’ roster as just another arm in a depth-heavy bullpen. Cashman’s decision-making here was like a no-brainer—easy as deciding to bundle up against the New York chill.
Bellinger’s defensive prowess is a game-changer. His versatility shone through last season, as he adeptly handled all three outfield positions and even dipped his toes into first base. Depending on New York’s collective movements this offseason, Aaron Boone could slot him into any of those roles come Opening Day. The current landscape suggests Bellinger will likely thrive at first or center, allowing Aaron Judge to shift back into right field, with Jasson Domínguez expanding his experience in left.
Financially, this deal is equally advantageous for the Yankees. Bellinger’s salary will tally at $25 million for 2025, while the Cubs shoulder a neat $5 million. Should Bellinger choose to opt out of his contract, the financial burden evenly splits. The gamble, however, rests primarily on the Yankees’ shoulders when it comes to Bellinger’s future output—especially in light of his fluctuating performance.
On the flip side, Kyle Tucker’s allure for the Cubs cannot be understated, even with the hefty price tag attached—three players, including the promising Cam Smith. This move certainly felt like a home run for the Cubs, while simultaneously serving as a strategic payroll maneuver, releasing funds for future needs.
Rowan Kavner expresses admiration for the Cubs’ plucky strategy, insisting they’d secured the superior talent in Tucker, a player potentially poised to contend for accolades alongside legends like Juan Soto. Despite having languished behind superstars in Houston, Tucker’s resume—his consistent WAR average over the last four seasons—demonstrates he’s more than ready to become the Cubs’ cornerstone.
Yet, the price for such talent is steep. Parting ways with emerging prospects is never easy. The Cubs sacrificed Isaac Paredes, ensuring Matt Shaw had space to flourish, while Cam Smith, the first-round pick, heads to Houston as the Astros’ new jewel. Thus, viewed on the surface, one might argue the Yankees might’ve emerged with a better deal, considering Poteet’s limited trajectory.
With the Yankees looking to fortify both outfield and first base, the Bellinger deal fills significant gaps without sacrificing critical assets. As for the left-handed slugger, his past season saw him pivot from power-hitting to a contact-focused approach, slashing his strikeout rate. Now, the Bronx could provide a platform for Bellinger to regain his former glory, particularly in a more conducive home-run territory compared to Wrigley.
Yet, the offseason remains ripe with possibilities. Both franchises are still in pursuit of further enhancements. The Yankees need additional offensive firepower, while the Cubs are poised to plunge into the pitching pool with the savings gleaned from Bellinger’s contract. Only time will unveil which trade will stand the test of competitive scrutiny, illuminating the path for both teams as they charge into the 2025 season.
